← All comparisons

Amurg vs Cursor Mobile

Cursor Mobile brings Cursor to your phone. Amurg brings any agent to any device.

TL;DR

  • Cursor Mobile only works with Cursor — no other agents, no custom tools.
  • iOS only. Amurg runs in any browser on any device.
  • No self-hosting option. Your data goes through Cursor's servers.
  • Requires a Cursor Pro subscription. Amurg starts at $5/month or free self-hosted.

Feature Comparison

Feature Amurg Cursor Mobile
Agents supported Any (8 built-in profiles) Cursor only
Platform Any browser (iOS, Android, desktop) iOS only
Multi-machine
Team support Via Cursor Teams
Inbound ports required
Permission gates Via Cursor
Audit log
Self-hostable
Open source Yes (Apache 2.0)
Voice input
Pricing $5/mo or free (self-host) $20/mo (Cursor Pro required)

Open vs Locked

Cursor Mobile is the mobile extension of the Cursor IDE. If you're all-in on Cursor, it gives you a way to check on background agents and start new tasks from your phone. That's genuinely useful.

But it's a walled garden. Only Cursor. Only iOS. Only their servers. If you use Copilot for some projects, or Codex for batch tasks, or a custom CLI tool for internal work — Cursor Mobile can't help.

Amurg is vendor-neutral. Eight adapter profiles out of the box — Claude Code, Copilot, Codex, Kilo Code, plus generic CLI, HTTP, and custom protocol support. Works in any browser on any device. Self-host to keep everything on your own network.

The agent landscape is evolving fast. Building your mobile workflow on a single vendor's app means rebuilding when you switch tools. Building it on an open control plane means adding a new profile config and keeping everything else.

Go vendor-neutral

Any agent, any device, your infrastructure. Connect your first agent in minutes.